- Home
- How We Score
One BestBoost Audit, Order by Order
Every score on this site starts with a paid order. We have run 304 of them so far, all bought at the going rate with our own money. Once a month the entire table goes back under the same checks, and that latest sweep finished on July 17, 2026. Nobody buys a position here. Nobody sees a rating before it goes live, and no shop has ever been offered the chance to.
Our Scoring Model
Five weighted inputs feed a Trust Score on a 0 to 100 scale, and every shop we buy from meets that identical set. Account risk carries 35%, more than any other input, because a fast finish counts for nothing if the login picks up a flag three weeks later. Delivery reliability takes the next slice at 25%, then pricing honesty and buyer feedback we could actually trace, with support quality closing it out. Popularity earns no points at all.
| Factor | Weight | What goes into it |
|---|---|---|
| Account risk and handling | 35% | Whether the shop hides the session while it plays, whether it routes the login through the player's own country, how credentials get stored and who inside the shop can touch them. We also weigh how straight the shop talks about the ToS exposure it takes on your behalf, and what it does with access once the work ends. |
| Completion reliability & speed | 25% | Did the paid order finish, did it finish by the time we were quoted, and did work begin anywhere near the start we were promised. Every pause, every handover to a second player and every gap between the result bought and the result delivered goes into the log. |
| Pricing clarity | 15% | The figure on the checkout screen against the figure on the product page, tracked through repeated price sweeps on a fixed basket. Late surcharges, conversion spreads and refund conditions that exist in writing before a card is handed over all move this number. |
| Buyer feedback we could verify | 15% | Reviews we can tie to an actual purchase, weighted above raw volume. We strip astroturf clusters, read how the shop answers an angry customer in public, and look at the shape of the complaint history instead of the headline average. |
| Support quality | 10% | Response time and answer quality on live tickets we opened as ordinary customers, plus one deliberately awkward request per shop (a mid-order change, an unusual region, a question no macro covers) to see what happens when the script runs out. |
What the Tiers Mean
Excellent goes to anything sitting at 90 or higher, Good covers the 75 to 89 band, Fair holds the 60 to 74 stretch, and a shop finishing under 60 carries Poor until a later re-audit says otherwise.
The Checks We Run
- Bought at retail. Every shop in the table gets ordered from a personal card, no press access and no comped account. We timestamp the checkout, the first message from the assigned player, each status change and the moment the job closes. That is how a 304-order log turns into speed figures we can defend line by line.
- Scheduled price sweeps. A fixed basket of identical orders gets re-priced on a calendar, not whenever we happen to remember. Repeat passes catch the shops that quietly lift a tier between visits, and they catch the ones whose sale banner never actually ends.
- Checkout under a microscope. We walk the whole purchase flow and hold the final charge against the advertised figure. Service fees bolted on at the last step, conversion spreads, pre-ticked add-ons and insurance upsells all get written down, along with how many clicks it takes to reach the refund policy from the buy button.
- Post-order account sweep. Once the work is done we go through the account itself: active sessions, login locations in the security history, linked devices, and anything altered without being mentioned to us. Credentials get replaced afterwards, and any shop that made that step awkward gets marked for it.
- Refunds, tested live. A written policy only means something once somebody tests it, so we file at least one real claim per shop on an order we genuinely paid for. What counts is how long the money takes to come back, whether the reply matches the published wording, and whether a partial is pushed where a full return was owed.
Independence Rules
No shop can buy a place in this table, and every order behind these scores came out of our own budget. What that looks like in practice:
- When a shop shows us we got something wrong, the correction lands on the page with the date it changed. We do not swap a line at midnight and pretend it always read that way.
- Affiliate links exist and they pay for the order log, but they move neither the ranking nor a single point of any Trust Score. A shop with no programme whatsoever can and does outrank one that pays.
- Same tests, same five weights, same buying process for everyone in the table, whether we enjoyed dealing with the brand or not.
Errors and Corrections
We get things wrong, and when we do the fix belongs where readers can see it. If a figure here does not match what you paid or what you were told, send the page link and the disputed line to fixes@bestboost.net. Every claim gets checked against our own order logs and the receipts filed with them before a word on the page moves.
Who Places the Orders
Austin Drake, Testing Lead. Austin coaches Fortnite and Apex full time, and that day job is where he learned which boosting shops deliver on the clock and which ones go quiet once the money clears. Every service on this list gets ordered from his own card, all 304 orders of it, and he runs the monthly re-audit himself, with the latest one closing July 17, 2026.